Mind & Matter & Morality © Marty Monteiro
PRESS ARTICLE
two brains are b etter than one
Universal Essence Of Existence
If you read articles, hear and see talks around you, the words as soul, spirit, consciousness, mind, body, good and evil are coming over you. Man is and was always intrigued by the mind and morality, making up an integral part of his existence. In the search to unseal this conundrum of how matter influences the mind and reverse how the mind influences matter, and how to live life in a decent moral way, several attempts are undertaken. What is striking in the mind-matter approach through time is that the human being is viewed as an individual without taking in ensemble another individual into consideration. Witness the two main schools of thinking in philosophy/science about this topic; the approach from the environment of how the mind emerges from matter (3rd person as object in materialism, as for instance in brain research) or from the individual of how the environment is mentally constructed and experienced (1st person as subject in mentalism). Is not the time coming to scrutinize the individual in relation with another individual as the object of study?
You & I
In everyday life, people hold that the flow of consciousness is not only bound to a single person. It is general believed that physical energy, like emotion and motivation, and mental energy as in mental contact and communication, surpass the border of the skin. One speaks in terms of physics of ‘radiation’ and ‘transmission’ of energies. The body in solid physical state also function at energy level between persons. An example of wireless mental-material energy transfer between persons are the phenomena of ‘mind-reading’, the perception of other’s mind-set, and ‘empathy’, the sharing of other’s feelings. Though not visible, mental energy transfer is not so mysterious as one think; it is hypothesized to be reflected by observable activity of mirror neurons in the brains. In the framework of a social perspective, the fundamental questions are therefore how matter®mind and mind®matter transitions are connected with each other, thereby crossing ‘thresholds’. What happens within and between the thresholds and under what conditions?
Everything Is Relative
Through incorporating the social framework into the mind-matter architecture, implies a 1st and 2nd person dependency on each other in their mental and behavioural functions. The interpersonal domain mirrors and measures off the personal domain. If the phenomena of mental contact, communication and entanglement are plausible and are assumed to exist, then the mind cannot be linked only to experience of pain or pleasure or moral good or bad. In mental contact, a fast speed sudden mental click of for example falling in love, a primary active mind flows and is always prior to experiencing. People are only aware of contact afterwards. The mind as an energy force towards and from the environment has therefore a active function, called cognition, and a passive function, called perception. The mind, however, is ‘partly’ concomitant with matter, they flow at distinctive level, otherwise in case of a 100% mind and matter correspondence, no distinction would exist. It is therefore claimed that the mind flows faster then light (speed of light = ± 300.000 m/s), relative to physical energy or matter, travelling equal to or below the speed of light.
Material- Versus Mental Growth
The advantage of “You – I” approach concerns the transparency to that what happens in the individual private domain. Contrary to the invisible mind, the social realm of mutual behaviour and transactions of matter are observable. But the question is focussed on how behaviour, behavioural products and material energy are connected to mental energy. If physical energy is partly attendant by the mental energy flow and in case of mental contact, then one can assume behaviour to take place; apparently mental contact generates feedback to be transformed into matter or behaviour. How is this possible? It is a physical fact that at particle level, appearing and disappearing of elements occurs. This could mean that in case of mind®matter, mental energy becomes ‘partly’ visible within matter. The invisible mental part function to bind matter, as the ‘strong force’. In the matter®mind transition, matter disappears to be broken apart (e.g. black hole in the cosmos), but in between the invisible crashed energies additional mental structures are generated.
The mind-matter transformations in the distinctive thresholds of appearing mental- and disappearing material energy are connected with each other on the basis of which material development on the one hand and the individual mental growth on the other take place. The evolution of matter is not only bound to human culture, but also to nature with increasing matter in the cosmos to the advent of species culminating in the human being. Although man’s mental development is hidden in direct sense, it is for example manifest in higher-order abstract language and generalization. If the mind-matter make up in man reflects the whole universe, one can claim that material evolution is in the way back attendent by mental evolution. The mind then is not only an affair of humans and less complex organisms, but is present from the beginning as a universal phenomenon.
God, To Be Or Not To Be?
If the material- and mental evolution is valid, the question arises whether an ‘intelligent design’ can be postulated. Is the human being able to provide evidence for a supra-individual being, a creator of which he is in mind and body a part of? Can he take a position beyond himself outside the universe? The answer is simple, no he cannot. A direct proof or arguments of the existence or non-existence of a God is impossible. The statement of where all beings come from pointing to a higher-order being is for many obvious, but who is then the creator of the creator, etc., thereby trapping into a butterfly effect. The statement that the human being is longing to existential certainty and therefore is looking for a supra-individual being and that his faith in a God is a projection, however, is not an argument against God’s non-existence. It is true that the human being cannot escape his mind and body, and even in the so-called ‘out of body experience’, leaving energy from his body belongs to his split-body, is a special case of mind-reading of oneself.
The question arises whether man can never give evidence of an intelligent designer or that a supra-individual force can be assumed to exist on basis of reality. Is therefore a cosmic outlook prerequisite to conclude to an intelligent design? It is taken for granted that mental development occurs in the unconscious domain beyond subjective experience. Mentalization, however, is an event back in time compared to the forward time flow in materialization. Higher-order mentalization is, however, not a linear event, but occurs through discontinuous transitions (gaps). When a child learns the words mom and dad, a 2®1 merging event occurs into one term of parents. In the backward event, stored environmental energy is through the gravitational force annihilated in the ‘black hole’, to generate a mentalized higher-order concept. If for example one takes a piece of paper and tear it in halves again and again, then every time between the halves of paper, added mental relation is established. Does the resulting exponential rise of mental connections resulting in mental synergy, an occurrence beyond perception, points to a hidden force?
Within the gap of mentalization, material energy is annihilated, but not lost. The other side of the coin is that based on annihilated energy, transformed new higher-order mental-material energy appears. The genesis of new energy, appearing in thoughts and values is again transformed before perception. In the mind®matter transition, the mental is partly embodied to appear and the invisible part as the strong force binds physical energy. In mind®matter merging transformation of two personal minds into matter, result in material synergy. Although the 2®1 matter®mind and 2®1 mind®matter merging transformations are equal, a huge difference exists. In matter®mind transformation, ‘new’ material-mental energy is built up, emerging as preformed energies. In mind®matter transformation, the new energies are only mentally transformed partly to visible matter. The hidden mental binding force in matter makes that things and people can be perceived and is the basis of mentalization. Does this imply that the creation of the pre-conscious event of new thoughts and values points to a supra-individual being?
God’s Hand?
A well-known controversy concerns the evolution to be ascribed to an ‘intelligent designer’ as the creator of the cosmos and all beings, known as ‘creationism’, versus the development of culture and nature for which humans to atoms are accountable, known as ‘evolutionism’. Material physical-biological and social-cultural evolution finds general favour, because it is based on evidence of environmental adaptability of the fittest accounting for survival (e.g. Darwin); an intelligent designer is therefore superfluous and unnecessary. This concerns the border between belief (faith) and knowledge (science) and raises the question whether any evidence exists to sustain belief as plausible. How can evolutionism as well as creationism be compatible with each other? Trying to tackle this issue, materialization and mentalization are both relevant. It is claimed that hierarchical mentalization and subsequent mental-material genesis of new thoughts and values is on account of a unifying-creating force (UCF). An example of the compatibility between evolutionism as well as creationism is as follows (BOX):
BOX. A baby is biophysical decoupled from his mother by cutting the umbilical cord at the moment of birth. The baby is now physically an independent being, but through the love bond with him, they are mentally coupled to each other. Thus the child’s physical independency keeps its mental dependency on both parents. Between the parents and the child there exist a ‘material disconnection’ and ‘mental connection’.
By nature partners are equipped with cells to procreate and to take a child as a basic value in the trail of evolution. However, they are not obliged to bring a new being into the world, it is their free decision. Thus, on the one hand, one is bound to one’s own preformed body, but on the other, one is mentally free to use in loan the body. Therefore, material dependency on and mental decoupling with UCF is assumed, claiming a ‘mental disconnection’ and ‘material connection’.
Life After Death?
An issue bothering many people, concerns the conundrum whether life after death exists to reincarnate in the next life. Direct evidence can of course not obtained, regardless many people are disappointed going back from tunnelling to earthen life in ‘near-death-experience’. The material-mental energy input-output cycle and especially the ‘higher-order’ mentalization serves as the spring-board on basis of which ‘life-after-death’ can be claimed. In mentalization, matter-in-mind transformation takes place through annihilation, the ‘death’ of material energy. In the black hole disappeared invisible matter is not lost, but reappears mentally restructured. This principle applied, implies that the mind or soul escapes the dying body to emerge in a reborn mental-material format. The minute-to-minute perception-behaviour cycle also holds for the eternal cycle. Don’t be afraid when time has come, as the body falls in decay, the escaping indestructible mind or soul embodies itself in the next life cycle, to enjoy an eternal life; a pretty prospect.
Is-Ought
Mind and matter is closely linked to morality of good and evil as the most profound mental experience. The ‘is-ought’ statement denotes that moral good or bad justification or judgment of a person or a group is inferred from (past) behaviour or behavioural products and/or its (future) consequences; what one has done, does or will do. A person’s morality is, however, not only based on behaviour, but also on someone’s energy state or mind-set, to be read and judged by other’s intuition (perception), as for example honesty, nasty, etc. A person’s mind-set can be perceived by others, called ‘mind-reading’, and only through feedback the person is able to know his morality afterwards (self-concept). Thus to perceive other’s or one’s own morality is interpersonally based. This implies that the flow of the primary mind “I”, called ‘cognition’, is linked to perception of others. The source of morality is therefore personally and pre-conscious seated in the “I” of cognition. Thus basically, confirmation of morality takes place in the mental flow between 1st person’s morality and 2nd person’s morality testing.
Mental- And Moral Growth
Morality is in principle a mental affair between persons, sustained by the mind-set and/or behaviour. The mentality of morality raises the question whether moral development keeps pace with mental development. Furthermore one could question whether mental development is specifically a human affair or that it is already nested hidden in evolution. Is mentalization, an event ‘backward in time’, only culminating in human beings? However, time reversal is also inferred through observation of light travelling from distant stars. If on basis of time reversal, mental evolution reflects the whole universal existence, it is questionable whether morality is only bound to humans. However, material evolution is interlarded with gaps between elements and species. This implies that morality does not hold between species built for the kill to survive. If only a horizontal morality within species is claimed, then the evolutionary mental growth, interrupted by the gaps, is attendant by a ‘layered’ morality.
The evolutionary gaps, reflected in the ‘missing link’ and ‘quantum leap’, forbids to draw a causal connection in the tree of material- as well as mental development. The claim that man is a direct descendent from apes, despite he is a look alike, is therefore questionable. The mental-material evolutionary gaps and the layered morality, raises an ethical problem. Especially in the domain of the consequences of human behaviour affecting the (far) future. Through the evolutionary upgrading of ‘mental degrees of freedom’, man bears a higher responsibility. If natural resources are exploited and the natural balance is disturbed, the borders of ethics, as a reference frame, are surpassed. Although a vertical morality between species and elements is not claimed, an ethical framework is applicable to maintain a balanced state. Universal layered morality and the feedback of ethics by crossing borders, is ultimately aimed at individual, interpersonal and collective utility.
Review
The above treatise in the framework of a social point of view, throws a new light on mind-matter-morality issue. The “You” and “I” small-scale set up, serves as the framework for a large-scale perspective. The most fundamental claim is posted: the existence of a supra-individual pull-push energy source, called ‘unifying-creating force’ (cf. 0-point energy, big bang, big birth, god), as the beating hart of the whole universe. The UCF, as a top democratic force, leaves man mentally free to bear his own moral responsibility to challenge life. In the eternal space-time cycle back and forth, the journey turning around the 0-point of UCF, evolution of materialization and mentalization always takes place. On basis of this picture, the eternal mind escapes and supervenes the dying body, ranging from persons to cosmos, to restart life again and again; a perpetuum mobile.
In this abridged, popularized and peer-reviewed article it is tried to unveil basic life questions many people are occupied with. The relativity of reality has to be emphasized; seeing with two eyes in depth and two sides of a coin; everybody is right under specific condition, nobody can claim the absolute truth, manifest for example in the relativity of morality, not only a human affair, but also in the framework of the mind a universal matter, stretching out in the far past and far future.
The book version is a treatise with a handful of well-known observables (stimulus-need, norm-value) and postulates (cognition-perception), sustained on theories and experiments in physics, biology and psychology. The model is designed from the perspective of interaction between things and between persons in the relative framework of finality (goal) as well as causality (cause-effect). The mind-matter model serves as the framework for a model of mind-morality.
Monteiro, Marty (2009), Model Of Man: Mind & Matter – Mind & Morality.
AEG Publishing Group, New York-London-Frankfurt.
200 p. ISBN Price $ 29.50? Hardcover
Correspondence: marty.monteiro@yahoo.com
The mind-matter model is poster and orally presented on the conferences: Dynamic Ontology (Trento, 2004), Consciousness and Experiencing Psychology (Oxford, 2005), Models of Brain and Mind: Physical, Computational and Psychological Approaches (Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics, Kolkata, 2006) and Quantum Mind (Salzburg, 2007).
To discuss more with Monteiro, Marty about this case study and his book, join Yahoo group at:
Rational Solution