Anders Sandberg is a Great computer scientist and humman mind thinker.
Education
Upper secondary school (“Studentexamen”) at the natural science programme at Vasalundsgymnasiet, Solna 1991.
Student at the mathematics-natural science program with computer science specialization at Stockholm University and independent courses at the Karolinska Institute, Stockholm University and the Royal Institute of Technology 1991-1997.
M.Sc degree in computer science 1997 from Stockholm University.
Ph.D. degree in computer science 2003 from Stockholm University.
Doctoral Thesis
Doctoral thesis: Bayesian Attractor Neural Network Models of Memory.
Master’s Degree
Master’s thesis: Gesture Recognition Using Neural Networks
Publications
Books
Anders Sandberg, Alexander Sanchez & Waldemar Ingdahl, Som Egenmäktiga Gudar: Den svenska debatten om gen- och bioteknik på 1970- och 80-talen, Timbro Förlag, 2002.
Book Chapters
“Kong Markatta II – en transhumanists erkendelser” in Homo sapiens 2.0 – Når teknologien kryber ind under huden, ed. Gert Balling, ISBN 87-12-03890-3, Gads Forlag, 2002
“The Vastening of David Zindell” and cover in Earth Is but a Star : Excursions Through Science Fiction to the Far Future, ed. Damien Broderick, Univ of Western Australia Press, 2001
Computational Neuroscience
Anders Sandberg and Erik Fransen, An Autocatalytic Model of STDP Timing from Slow Calcium Signals. To be published in Neurocomputing.
Anders Sandberg, Jesper Tegnér and Anders Lansner, A Working Memory Model Based on Fast Learning. Network: Computation in Neural Systems, volume 14, issue 4, pages 789-802, 2003.
Anders Lansner, Erik Fransen and Anders Sandberg. Cell assembly dynamics in detailed and abstract attractor models of cortical associative memory, Theory in Biosciences 122:19-35, 2002
Christopher Johansson, Anders Sandberg and Anders Lansner, A Neural Network with Hypercolumns, Proceedings of ICANN-2002, Madrid, Springer-Verlag 2002
Anders Sandberg, Anders Lansner, Karl-Magnus Petersson & Örjan Ekeberg, A Bayesian attractor network with incremental learning. Network: Computation in Neural Systems volume 13 issue 2 (May 2002) 79-194.
Anders Sandberg & Anders Lansner, Synaptic Depression as an Intrinsic Driver of Reinstatement Dynamics in an Attractor Network. Neurocomputing 44-46: 615-622 (2002)
Anders Lansner and Anders Sandberg (2001). Functionality and Performance of Brain-Inspired Neural Networks. NOLTA 2001, Zao, Sendai, Japan. 501-504.
Anders Sandberg, Anders Lansner, Karl-Magnus Petersson, Selective Enhancement of Recall through Plasticity Modulation in an Autoassociative Memory. Neurocomputing 38-40 (2001) 867-873.
Anders Lansner, Anders Sandberg and K. M. Petersson. On Forgetful Attractor Memories. ANNIMAB-1, Gothemburg, Sweden. 54-62. (2000) Invited.
Anders Sandberg, Anders Lansner, Karl-Magnus Petersson and Örjan Ekeberg, A Palimpsest Memory based on an Incremental Bayesian Learning Rule, Neurocomputing 32-33 (2000) 987-994.
Anders Sandberg, Anders Lansner, Karl-Magnus Petersson and Örjan Ekeberg, An incremental Bayesian learning rule, Tech. report TRITA-NA-P9908 NADA, KTH, Stockholm 1999.
Mikael Djurfeldt, Anders Sandberg. See — a framework for simulation of biologically detailed and artificial neural networks and systems. Neurocomputing 26-27 (1999) 997-1003
Intelligence Amplification
One of the most promising transhumanist goals is to increase the mental abilities of humans to new levels. This can be done using various cognition enhancing drugs (nootropics), bionic enhancements, uploading, information management strategies or ancient methods like mnemonics, training or efficient thinking.
Another goal is to be able to modify our minds; to change our personalities, memories, skills or thought-patterns to suit the situation or our ideals, see the Mental Enhancement Page for this.
People accept their limitations so as to prevent themselves from wanting anything they might get.
Celia Green
There is no a priori reason why a human being should not combine the qualities, say, of Einstein, Shakespeare, Mozart, Darwin, J.M.W. Turner, a nuthatch and a pocket calculator. Indeed, there is no a priori reason why such a paragon should not be considered ordinary.
Colin Tudge
Transhumanism has many forms, sometimes apparently contradictory. Its essence is in my opinion, that we humans can, and shouldcontinue to develop ourselves in all possible directions. The bodies and minds evolution has given us are wonderful, but far from perfect. They can be improved in many ways, and this can be done in a rational manner using science and technology. In the same way many other parts of the “Human Condition” may be changed through new methods and visions. In the long run, we will no longer be human anymore, but posthuman beings.
Of course, not all people would like to go this far. Some might want to improve themselves somewhat, but still remain essentially as before. Others might reject any improvements outright for various reasons. From a transhumanistic standpoint, this is no problem. If they don’t want to go in our direction, they are welcome to remain humans. What we cannot accept is other people putting restrictions on our quest towards transhumanity; in that case we have to prevent them from interfering, probably by simply avoiding them. In no way do we want to force anybody to anything.
Reference:
http://www.aleph.se/